Featured Articles

on March 17, 2008.
Last week we presented estimates of the shifts in profits and economic activity between the foreign sector (treated as a single aggregate) and the United States ("U.S. Multinationals Shifting Profits Out of the United States," Tax Notes, Mar. 10, 2008, p. 1078, Doc 2008-4725 or 2008 TNT 48-3)). We calculated the decline in the worldwide effective tax rate and quantified the causes of that decline, estimating a $17.4 billion annual revenue loss for increased profit shifting between 1999 and 2004. This week we will look at shifts within the foreign sector (that is, among foreign countries) and will quantify the factors behind the decline in the foreign effective tax rate faced by U.S. multinational corporations.
The effective foreign tax rate on the foreign earnings of U.S. multinational corporations declined from 31.7 percent in 1999 to 28.7 percent in 2004. If we exclude the profits trapped in a handful of resource-rich, high-tax countries that have a large mining sector, the decline in effective foreign tax rates is larger — from 30.3 percent to 25.2 percent.
Table 1. Summary Calculations
(dollar amounts in millions)
A. All Countries
Using Actual 1999 Profits
($142.3 Billion)
Actual and Estimated Foreign Taxes:
Using 1999 rates $45,070
Using 2004 rates $42,944
Average Effective Foreign Tax Rate:
Using 1999 rates 31.7%
Using 2004 rates 30.2%
B. Excluding Eight Countries With Mining Tangible Assets
Exceeding 60 Percent of Total Tangible Assets
Using Actual 1999 Profits
($132.5 Billion)
Actual and Estimated Foreign Taxes:
Using 1999 rates $40,123
Using 2004 rates $37,851
Average Effective Foreign Tax Rate:
Using 1999 rates 30.3%
Using 2004 rates 28.6%
[table continued]
Using Projected 2004 Profits
($224 Billion)
Actual and Estimated Foreign Taxes:
Using 1999 rates $69,205
Using 2004 rates $65,243
Average Effective Foreign Tax Rate:
Using 1999 rates 30.9%
Using 2004 rates 29.1%
B. Excluding Eight Countries With Mining Tangible Assets
Exceeding 60 Percent of Total Tangible Assets
Using Projected 2004 Profits
($207.3 Billion)
Actual and Estimated Foreign Taxes:
Using 1999 rates $60,341
Using 2004 rates $55,915
Average Effective Foreign Tax Rate:
Using 1999 rates 29.1%
Using 2004 rates 27.0%
[table continued]
Using Actual 2004 Profits
($258.5 Billion)
Actual and Estimated Foreign Taxes:
Using 1999 rates $78,262
Using 2004 rates $74,069
Average Effective Foreign Tax Rate:
Using 1999 rates 30.3%
Using 2004 rates 28.7%
B. Excluding Eight Countries With Mining Tangible Assets Exceeding
60 Percent of Total Tangible Assets
Using Actual 2004 Profits
($230.9 Billion)
Actual and Estimated Foreign Taxes:
Using 1999 rates $62,102
Using 2004 rates $58,247
Average Effective Foreign Tax Rate:
Using 1999 rates 26.9%
Using 2004 rates 25.2%
Source: Calculations in Table 3.
This 5 percentage point decline in five years is due to a combination of three factors: (1) foreign governments lowering their corporate tax burdens; (2) U.S. corporations shifting real economic activity from high-tax to low-tax countries; and (3) U.S. corporations shifting profits from high-tax to low-tax countries. As shown in the calculations that follow, each of these three factors contributed about equally to the decline in the foreign effective tax rate. Figures 1 and 2 summarize the results.
Figure 1. Causes of the 5.1 Percentage Point Decline in the
Average Foreign Effective Tax Rate
(excluding countries with high concentration of mining)
Unlike last week's findings, the results presented here show no direct implications for U.S. taxes. This week's results, however, indicate that profit shifting is a problem for high-tax foreign jurisdictions as well as the United States and that the tax incentive for U.S. corporations to shift economic activity to foreign jurisdictions is increasing.
Table 1 summarizes the results illustrated in figures 1 and 2. (The values in Table 1 referred to in this paragraph are in bold.) Panel A shows that the foreign effective tax rate including all countries declined from 31.7 percent in 1999 to 28.7 percent in 2004. Panel B presents the same information but excludes eight jurisdictions that have large mining sectors. Among the remaining jurisdictions, the effective foreign corporate tax rate declined from 30.3 percent to 25.2 percent.
For reasons explained in the following section, the results in Panel B are probably more useful for understanding the behavior of U.S. multinationals. Panel B can be used to break down the decline in the effective foreign tax rate into three parts.
Table 2. Countries With Mining and High Tax Rates, 2004
(dollar amounts in millions)
Total Tangible Tangible Capital Effective
Jurisdiction Capital of Mining Sector Mining Ratio Tax Rate
Nigeria $5,737 $5,556 97% 80.9%
Other Middle East 3,969 3,624 91% 53.7%
Indonesia 6,526 5,549 85% 44.6%
Egypt 1,864 1,516 81% 47.5%
Other Africa 10,992 8,423 77% 41.1%
Peru 2,935 2,154 73% 34.0%
Saudi Arabia 110 79 72% *
Norway 13,343 9,235 69% 69.7%
Source: Data on tangible assets by industry are from Table
3.B7 of the 2004 Bureau of Economic Analysis Survey. Details are in
the notes to this article.
* In Saudi Arabia in 2004, taxes and before-tax profits in 2004 were
$297 million and -$139 million, respectively.
U.S. Multinationals, 1999 and 2004
First, there is the portion of the decline due to a drop in within-country tax rates — from 30.3 percent to 28.6 percent. The latter figure was calculated by multiplying 1999 profits by 2004 tax rates. That's a decline of approximately 1.7 percentage points.
Second, there is the portion of the decline due to shifting of real economic activity. This corresponds to the fundamental premise in the practical allocation of profits for tax purposes that profits are roughly proportional to measurable economic activity. For our purposes, we have assumed that profit growth corresponding to changes in real economic activity (and not due to artificial profit shifting) grows at the same rate as the average of the growth rates of assets, tangible capital (property, plant, equipment), sales, and employee compensation. As real activity moves from high- to low-tax countries, profits decline from 28.6 percent to 27 percent — a decline of approximately 1.6 percentage points.
Third, there is the portion of the decline due to profit shifting in excess of the portion due to movements in real activity. Actual profits shifted even more than projected profits into low-tax countries, reducing the average effective foreign tax rate from 27 percent to 25.2 percent — a decline of approximately 1.8 percentage points.
Mining (Not Data)
Looking at the data on taxes and profits, one is struck by the high tax rates paid on large amounts of profits in some countries. It turns out that those countries are rich in natural resources, mostly petroleum. Table 5 shows that countries with a high concentration of mining activity among U.S. multinationals had effective tax rates far above the 25.2 percent average in other countries.
Table 3A. Majority-Owned Foreign Affiliates
of U.S. Multinational Corporations, 1999
(dollar amounts in billions)
Number of Adjusted Tangible
Jurisdiction Affiliates Assets Capital Sales
All 21,042 $3,525.4 $592.9 $2,218.9
1 Canada 1,859 306.8 75.7 281.3
2 United
Kingdom 2,535 1,037.7 119.4 345.6
3 Ireland 394 77.2 8.1 58.4
4 Japan 651 241.3 18.4 121.8
5 Netherlands 1,117 187.0 15.2 117.6
6 Germany 1,327 228.7 36.6 203.3
7 Switzerland 462 83.4 4.0 70.9
8 Bermuda 296 115.0 4.0 19.3
9 Mexico 802 71.2 20.4 81.5
10 France 1,174 123.3 22.2 124.1
11 Singapore 439 62.8 9.7 78.6
12 Australia 773 92.9 33.6 59.7
13 Norway 165 18.0 10.1 13.9
14 Belgium 542 75.7 9.8 57.1
15 Italy 680 59.9 10.6 68.6
16 Other
Africa 216 18.2 8.6 9.5
17 Hong Kong 502 64.3 8.9 47.3
18 Indonesia 140 20.1 13.0 9.1
19 China 453 24.5 8.8 20.4
20 Nigeria 43 7.1 3.8 4.2
21 Spain 533 39.8 9.1 47.7
22 Malaysia 181 18.3 6.3 21.8
23 Cayman
Islands 245 68.0 2.4 10.5
24 Other
Europe 162 14.5 7.2 6.4
25 Brazil 533 79.4 25.7 56.1
26 Sweden 319 31.9 4.7 29.6
27 Other
Middle East 49 4.3 1.9 2.6
28 Taiwan 215 26.6 2.7 18.8
29 Thailand 181 17.3 7.1 14.6
30 South
Korea 195 12.2 3.4 11.3
All Other 3,859 297.9 81.5 207.6
[table continued]
Before-
Employee Foreign Tax Effective
Compensation Taxes Profits Tax Rate
All $254.9 $45.1 $142.3 31.7%
1 Canada 32.2 6.4 18.2 35.0%
2 United
Kingdom 48.9 6.4 17.8 35.8%
3 Ireland 2.8 1.1 11.4 9.6%
4 Japan 15.7 4.1 9.0 45.4%
5 Netherlands 7.7 1.9 6.5 28.4%
6 Germany 32.4 3.2 8.2 38.8%
7 Switzerland 4.1 0.7 4.1 17.6%
8 Bermuda 0.3 0.2 3.7 6.1%
9 Mexico 7.8 2.2 6.4 33.5%
10 France 22.0 2.0 4.5 43.7%
11 Singapore 3.4 0.5 3.8 14.2%
12 Australia 9.1 1.0 3.2 30.9%
13 Norway 1.9 1.1 2.0 55.8%
14 Belgium 6.5 1.0 3.2 30.1%
15 Italy 8.5 1.8 3.8 47.4%
16 Other
Africa 0.6 0.7 1.2 64.1%
17 Hong Kong 3.6 0.4 3.5 12.6%
18 Indonesia 0.6 1.1 3.0 36.2%
19 China 1.7 0.2 1.0 23.6%
20 Nigeria 0.2 1.1 1.7 63.6%
21 Spain 5.9 0.9 3.2 28.1%
22 Malaysia 1.1 0.2 1.7 13.2%
23 Cayman
Islands 0.4 0.2 1.8 9.1%
24 Other
Europe 0.5 0.2 0.3 49.0%
25 Brazil 7.5 0.6 0.9 59.4%
26 Sweden 3.2 0.4 1.5 28.8%
27 Other
Middle East 0.2 0.7 1.2 58.7%
28 Taiwan 1.6 0.3 1.3 23.0%
29 Thailand 0.8 0.2 0.8 28.8%
30 South
Korea 1.3 0.4 1.2 31.0%
All Other 22.1 4.0 12.2 32.9%
Source: U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic
Analysis. Assets exclude equity investments in other affiliates.
Before-tax profit is net income plus foreign income tax minus income
from equity investments. The effective tax rate is foreign income tax
divided by before-tax profits. Details are in the notes to this
article.
Why are rates so high in those countries? The theory of tax competition says that as capital becomes increasingly mobile, the rate of tax on income from those profits will be driven down. And in fact we are observing a general decline in effective tax rates around the globe.
But there are exceptions, as shown in tables 2 and 5. And this is completely consistent with the theory of tax competition because that theory applies only to mobile capital. Mining and oil extraction activities cannot be moved to Ireland, Bermuda, and Switzerland. Governments in host countries — like oil-rich Nigeria and Norway — extract high taxes from multinationals because they can do so with little fear of losing foreign investment.
Table 3B. Majority-Owned Foreign Affiliates
of U.S. Multinational Corporations, 2004
(dollar amounts in billions)
Number of Adjusted Tangible
Jurisdiction Affiliates Assets Capital Sales
All 22,819 $6,607.6 $766.9 $3,312.5
1 Canada 1,799 530.6 122.1 430.0
2 United
Kingdom 2,749 1,867.5 127.4 457.4
3 Ireland 510 286.4 13.8 134.4
4 Japan 697 446.3 28.0 185.0
5 Netherlands 1,319 417.2 20.9 143.9
6 Germany 1,448 311.4 49.7 251.3
7 Switzerland 532 186.5 6.8 135.9
8 Bermuda 351 255.0 4.7 47.9
9 Mexico 834 94.2 25.5 115.2
10 France 1,244 189.3 31.0 170.6
11 Singapore 477 100.4 10.0 133.9
12 Australia 774 140.9 30.2 86.2
13 Norway 169 35.0 17.3 26.8
14 Belgium 561 191.0 12.3 70.6
15 Italy 678 93.3 16.8 98.6
16 Other
Africa 265 45.8 20.5 22.2
17 Hong Kong 474 146.2 5.4 63.5
18 Indonesia 145 24.5 11.1 13.4
19 China 652 49.7 12.4 62.1
20 Nigeria 66 15.7 8.6 7.9
21 Spain 576 83.2 14.9 70.1
22 Malaysia 194 23.9 8.1 35.3
23 Cayman
Islands 363 221.7 2.1 20.0
24 Other
Europe 239 39.1 14.3 18.9
25 Brazil 535 72.0 18.5 69.3
26 Sweden 343 65.0 11.3 44.7
27 Other
Middle East 55 8.8 4.3 7.7
28 Taiwan 220 66.0 4.7 31.1
29 Thailand 211 30.3 7.4 29.2
30 South
Korea 246 29.3 6.0 25.2
All Other 4,093 541.5 100.9 304.2
[table continued]
Before-
Employee Foreign Tax Effective
Compensation Taxes Profits Tax Rate
All $331.6 $74.1 $258.5 28.7%
1 Canada 41.6 8.6 29.8 29.0%
2 United
Kingdom 64.0 8.4 18.3 45.8%
3 Ireland 4.6 1.9 23.5 8.2%
4 Japan 19.0 6.1 16.7 36.6%
5 Netherlands 10.7 2.9 9.0 32.0%
6 Germany 39.2 3.0 6.9 43.5%
7 Switzerland 5.7 1.1 10.1 11.3%
8 Bermuda 0.2 0.5 10.1 4.8%
9 Mexico 11.0 2.3 6.9 32.6%
10 France 27.8 2.6 8.6 30.6%
11 Singapore 3.7 0.9 8.8 10.5%
12 Australia 12.8 1.5 7.7 19.3%
13 Norway 2.1 5.3 7.6 69.7%
14 Belgium 8.2 0.9 5.9 15.0%
15 Italy 11.7 2.3 4.2 54.1%
16 Other
Africa 1.2 2.7 6.6 41.1%
17 Hong Kong 3.8 0.7 4.0 17.0%
18 Indonesia 0.9 1.9 4.2 44.6%
19 China 3.9 0.9 5.1 17.0%
20 Nigeria 0.3 3.1 3.8 80.9%
21 Spain 8.6 1.0 2.4 42.8%
22 Malaysia 1.4 0.7 3.1 21.5%
23 Cayman
Islands 0.4 0.1 2.8 3.6%
24 Other
Europe 1.5 0.9 3.9 24.0%
25 Brazil 6.7 1.3 3.2 41.6%
26 Sweden 6.4 0.2 2.6 5.8%
27 Other
Middle East 0.4 1.5 2.8 53.7%
28 Taiwan 1.9 0.7 2.7 28.0%
29 Thailand 1.1 0.8 3.1 24.8%
30 South
Korea 2.9 0.7 2.6 25.8%
All Other 28.1 8.7 31.7 27.5%
Source: U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic
Analysis. Assets exclude equity investments in other affiliates.
Before-tax profit is net income plus foreign income tax minus income
from equity investments. The effective tax rate is foreign income tax
divided by before-tax profit. Details are in the notes to this
article.
In this analysis, we present results with and without those eight mining-intensive economies. We think the results excluding those jurisdictions are more informative for assessing the behavioral responses of U.S. multinational corporations to taxes. Including mining-intensive countries in the analysis veils the effects taxes can have on multinational investments and profit shifting. Excluding them allows us to see the full effects of taxes on multinational corporations that can move their investment and profits across international borders.
Country-by-Country Calculations
The following tables provide the details behind the calculations presented so far. Tables 3A and 3B show the basic data for 1999 and 2004 for 30 jurisdictions. Jurisdictions are ranked by the sum of 1999 and 2004 before-tax profits.
Table 4. Growth of Measure of Business Activity and Before-Tax Profits
Ratio of 2004 Value to 1999 Value
Adjusted Tangible
Jurisdiction Assets Capital Sales
All 1.87 1.29 1.49
1 Canada 1.73 1.61 1.53
2 United
Kingdom 1.80 1.07 1.32
3 Ireland 3.71 1.70 2.30
4 Japan 1.85 1.53 1.52
5 Netherlands 2.23 1.38 1.22
6 Germany 1.36 1.36 1.24
7 Switzerland 2.24 1.72 1.92
8 Bermuda 2.22 1.17 2.49
9 Mexico 1.32 1.25 1.41
10 France 1.54 1.40 1.37
11 Singapore 1.60 1.03 1.70
12 Australia 1.52 0.90 1.45
13 Norway 1.95 1.71 1.92
14 Belgium 2.52 1.25 1.24
15 Italy 1.56 1.59 1.44
16 Other Africa 2.52 2.37 2.33
17 Hong Kong 2.27 0.61 1.34
18 Indonesia 1.22 0.85 1.48
19 China 2.03 1.42 3.05
20 Nigeria 2.20 2.27 1.85
21 Spain 2.09 1.63 1.47
22 Malaysia 1.30 1.30 1.62
23 Cayman
Islands 3.26 0.85 1.91
24 Other Europe 2.70 1.99 2.95
25 Brazil 0.91 0.72 1.24
26 Sweden 2.04 2.39 1.51
27 Other Middle
East 2.03 2.28 2.97
28 Taiwan 2.48 1.73 1.66
29 Thailand 1.75 1.05 2.01
30 South Korea 2.40 1.76 2.24
All Other 1.82 1.24 1.47
[table continued]
Average of
Employee Preceding Before-Tax
Jurisdiction Compensation Four Factors Profit
All 1.30 1.49 1.82
1 Canada 1.29 1.54 1.64
2 United
Kingdom 1.31 1.37 1.03
3 Ireland 1.61 2.33 2.05
4 Japan 1.21 1.53 1.85
5 Netherlands 1.40 1.56 1.38
6 Germany 1.21 1.29 0.84
7 Switzerland 1.39 1.82 2.47
8 Bermuda 0.76 1.66 2.78
9 Mexico 1.41 1.35 1.08
10 France 1.26 1.39 1.91
11 Singapore 1.08 1.35 2.33
12 Australia 1.40 1.32 2.39
13 Norway 1.11 1.67 3.80
14 Belgium 1.27 1.57 1.81
15 Italy 1.38 1.49 1.11
16 Other Africa 1.79 2.25 5.74
17 Hong Kong 1.03 1.31 1.13
18 Indonesia 1.40 1.24 1.42
19 China 2.23 2.18 4.95
20 Nigeria 1.59 1.98 2.21
21 Spain 1.45 1.66 0.75
22 Malaysia 1.26 1.37 1.87
23 Cayman
Islands 0.97 1.74 1.57
24 Other Europe 2.84 2.62 11.57
25 Brazil 0.89 0.94 3.44
26 Sweden 1.96 1.98 1.76
27 Other Middle
East 1.55 2.21 2.37
28 Taiwan 1.21 1.77 2.06
29 Thailand 1.52 1.58 3.74
30 South Korea 2.19 2.15 2.16
All Other 1.27 1.45 2.60
Source: Underlying data from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of
Economic Analysis, as presented in Table 1, panels A and B. See notes for
details.
Table 4 shows our measures of the growth of economic activity and how they were calculated. Take Canada, for example. From 1999 to 2004, assets of U.S. multinationals grew by 73 percent, tangible capital by 61 percent, sales by 53 percent, and employee compensation by 29 percent. The average growth of those four factors — 54 percent — is the projected rate of growth of profits attributable to changes in economic activity. Actual profits grew by 64 percent.
Table 5 shows per-country calculations behind those shown in Table 1. The totals shown in the top line of Table 5 are the source of the effective tax rates shown in Panel A of Table 1. The totals shown in the second line of Table 5 are the source of the effective tax rates shown in Panel B of Table 1. The figures below these two lines were each estimated on a per-country basis.
Notes on Data and Calculations
The two sources for all the data in this article are datasets described in:
- U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis, "U.S. Direct Investment Abroad, Final Results of the 1999 Benchmark Survey," Mar. 2004.
- U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis, "U.S. Direct Investment Abroad, Final Results of the 2004 Benchmark Survey," undated.
Table 5. Estimates of Profits and Taxes for Computation
of Effective Tax Rates
Before-Tax Profits
1999 2004 2004
Jurisdiction Actual Projected Actual
All $142,312 $212,092 $258,507
All
except
mining 132,477 207,297 230,908
1 Canada 18,200 28,039 29,770
2 United
Kingdom 17,802 24,471 18,294
3 Ireland 11,448 26,667 23,500
4 Japan 8,989 13,723 16,652
5 Netherlands 6,521 10,157 8,972
6 Germany 8,230 10,628 6,880
7 Switzerland 4,074 7,395 10,079
8 Bermuda 3,654 6,064 10,149
9 Mexico 6,441 8,686 6,928
10 France 4,511 6,279 8,633
12 Australia 3,208 4,219 7,682
13 Norway 1,989 3,325 7,556
14 Belgium 3,238 5,088 5,867
15 Italy 3,779 5,630 4,212
16 Other Africa 1,153 2,596 6,615
17 Hong Kong 3,511 4,613 3,974
18 Indonesia 2,955 3,657 4,186
19 China 1,032 2,251 5,109
20 Nigeria 1,723 3,409 3,801
21 Spain 3,163 5,255 2,359
22 Malaysia 1,671 2,290 3,117
23 Cayman
Islands 1,784 3,113 2,808
24 Other
Europe 339 888 3,922
25 Brazil 933 875 3,211
26 Sweden 1,492 2,948 2,629
27 Other
Middle East 1,191 2,627 2,825
28 Taiwan 1,293 2,289 2,664
29 Thailand 820 1,297 3,063
30 South Korea 1,183 2,540 2,559
All Other 128,931 203,595 224,268
[table continued]
Foreign Taxes Computed
Using 1999 Tax Rates
Using Using Using
Actual Projected Actual
1999 2004 2004
Jurisdiction Profits Profits Profits
All $45,068 $67,166 $81,865
All
except
mining 40,123 60,341 62,102
1 Canada 6,370 9,814 10,420
2 United
Kingdom 6,380 8,770 6,556
3 Ireland 1,103 2,569 2,264
4 Japan 4,078 6,226 7,554
5 Netherlands 1,854 2,888 2,551
6 Germany 3,190 4,119 2,667
7 Switzerland 717 1,301 1,774
8 Bermuda 223 370 619
9 Mexico 2,159 2,912 2,322
10 France 1,970 2,742 3,770
12 Australia 990 1,302 2,371
13 Norway 1,109 1,854 4,213
14 Belgium 974 1,530 1,765
15 Italy 1,790 2,667 1,995
16 Other Africa 739 1,664 4,240
17 Hong Kong 441 579 499
18 Indonesia 1,069 1,323 1,514
19 China 244 532 1,208
20 Nigeria 1,095 2,166 2,416
21 Spain 889 1,477 663
22 Malaysia 221 303 412
23 Cayman
Islands 162 283 255
24 Other
Europe 166 435 1,921
25 Brazil 554 519 1,907
26 Sweden 429 848 756
27 Other
Middle East 699 1,542 1,658
28 Taiwan 297 526 612
29 Thailand 236 373 882
30 South Korea 367 788 794
All Other 40,684 62,358 71,030
[table continued]
Foreign Taxes Computed
Using 2004 Tax Rates
Using Using Using
Actual Projected Actual
1999 2004 2004
Jurisdiction Profits Profits Profits
All $40,776 $60,769 $74,068
All
except
mining 37,851 55,915 58,247
1 Canada 5,274 8,125 8,627
2 United
Kingdom 8,156 11,211 8,381
3 Ireland 935 2,179 1,920
4 Japan 3,287 5,018 6,089
5 Netherlands 2,087 3,251 2,872
6 Germany 3,577 4,619 2,990
7 Switzerland 462 838 1,142
8 Bermuda 176 292 489
9 Mexico 2,100 2,832 2,259
10 France 1,382 1,924 2,645
12 Australia 620 816 1,485
13 Norway 1,386 2,316 5,264
14 Belgium 486 763 880
15 Italy 2,045 3,046 2,279
16 Other Africa 474 1,067 2,720
17 Hong Kong 597 785 676
18 Indonesia 1,317 1,630 1,866
19 China 176 384 871
20 Nigeria 1,394 2,758 3,075
21 Spain 1,354 2,250 1,010
22 Malaysia 359 492 669
23 Cayman
Islands 64 112 101
24 Other
Europe 81 213 941
25 Brazil 388 364 1,336
26 Sweden 86 170 152
27 Other
Middle East 639 1,410 1,516
28 Taiwan 362 640 745
29 Thailand 203 322 760
30 South Korea 305 655 660
All Other 39,865 60,363 64,684
Source: Underlying data from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of
Economic Analysis, as presented in Table 1, panels A and B. Projected 2004
profits are estimated for each jurisdiction by multiplying actual 1999 profits
by the average growth factors shown in the fifth numerical column of Table 2.
See notes for details.
The best starting point on the Web for working with these data are the files listed under "Comprehensive financial and operating data" at http://www.bea.gov/scb/account_articles/international/iidguide.htm#USDIA1.
The Commerce Department's Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) conducts comprehensive benchmark surveys of U.S. multinational corporations every five years. The years 1999 and 2004 were chosen for this study because the data available for these two years were the most comprehensive of recent years. Table A1 lists the source tables for the data shown in Table 1.
Table A1. Data Sources
Entries in this table show the table numbers from the BEA
survey from which the relevant data were taken.
1999 Survey 2004 Survey
Assets 3B1 3B1
Property, plant,
equipment 3A1 3A1
Sales 3A1 3A1
Compensation 3A1 3A1
Foreign income
tax 3E1 3E1
Before-tax profits 3E1 3E1
In each BEA survey, data are presented in five different groups. Group II is "Nonbank affiliates of nonbank U.S parents" and their parents. Group III is "Majority-owned nonbank affiliates of nonbank U.S. parents" and their parents. Last week's study drew most of its data from Group II. Because of more extensive data availability, this week's study uses Group II data only. As far as we can tell, the different data sets do not significantly change the results. For example, last week we estimated that the foreign effective tax rate declined from 31.8 percent to 28.6 percent compared with this week's estimated decline from 31.7 percent to 28.7 percent.
Before-tax income is equal to net income minus income from equity investments plus income taxes.
Asset totals are adjusted to exclude equity investments in affiliates.
The effective tax rate is the ratio of foreign income tax to before-tax profits.
Projected 2004 foreign profit is actual 1999 profit multiplied by a ratio. The ratio is the average of four other ratios: (a) 2004 foreign assets divided by 1999 foreign assets, (b) 2004 foreign tangible capital divided by 1999 foreign tangible capital, (c) 2004 foreign sales divided by 1999 foreign sales, and (d) 2004 foreign compensation divided by 1999 foreign compensation.
In tables 3A and 3B, effective tax rates for all countries — 31.7 percent and 28.7 percent — are calculated by dividing the sum of foreign taxes for all countries by the sum of before-tax profits for all countries. The effective tax rates for "All other" countries in the last row — 32.9 percent and 27.5 percent — were calculated by dividing the sum of foreign taxes of 34 jurisdictions (not shown in the table) by the sum of before-tax profits of the same jurisdictions.
In Table 4 the calculations shown for "All" and "All other" do not feed into the calculations shown in Table 5. The calculations for projected 2004 profits in Table 5 are all done separately for 64 jurisdictions.
In Table 5 the values for the aggregate values shown for "All," "All except mining," and "Other" are computed by adding the sums of the values computed for the individual jurisdictions in their category.
"Other Europe" includes Albania, Andorra, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Estonia, Georgia, Gibraltar, Iceland, Kazakhstan, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Macedonia, Malta, Moldova, Montenegro, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Turkmenistan, Ukraine, and Uzbekistan.
"Other Africa" is all of Africa excluding Egypt, Nigeria, and South Africa.
"Other Middle East" includes Bahrain, Iran, Iraq, Jordan, Kuwait, Lebanon, Oman, Qatar, Syria, and Yemen.
About Tax Analysts
Tax Analysts is an influential provider of tax news and analysis for the global community. Over 150,000 tax professionals in law and accounting firms, corporations, and government agencies rely on Tax Analysts' federal, state, and international content daily. Key products include Tax Notes, Tax Notes Today, State Tax Notes, State Tax Today, Tax Notes International, and Worldwide Tax Daily. Founded in 1970 as a nonprofit organization, Tax Analysts has the industry's largest tax-dedicated correspondent staff, with more than 250 domestic and international correspondents. For more information, visit our home page.
For reprint permission or other information, contact communications@tax.org



