|
DOCUMENTS
ON THE REVENUE AND STAMP ACTS 1764-1767
-
Petition from the Massachusetts House of Representatives to the House
of Commons November 3, 1764
- Petition
of the Virginia House of Burgesses to the House of Commons December
18 1764
- Virginia
Stamp Act Resolutions May 30, 1765
- The
Declarations of the Stamp Act Congress, 1765
- Non-importation
Agreement of New York Merchants October 31, 1765
- Connecticut
Resolutions on the Stamp Act December 10, 1765
- Lt.-Gov.
William Bull to the Board of Trade November 3, 1765
- Letter of Henry
Cruger, Jr. to Henry Cruger, Sr. February 14, 1766 and [To Aaron Lopez,
Bristol, 1 March 1766]
Petition
from the Massachusetts House of Representatives to the
House of Commons November 3, 1764
The petition of
the Council and House of Representatives of his Majesty's Province of
Massachusetts Bay, Most humbly showeth:
That the Act passed
in the last session of Parliament, entitled " An act for granting certain
duties in the British colonies and plantations in America," etc., must
necessarily bring many burdens upon the inhabitants of these colonies
and plantations, which your petitioners conceive would not have been
imposed if a full representation of the state of the colonies had been
made to your honourable House. That the duties laid upon foreign sugars
and molasses by a former Act of Parliament entitled " an Act for the
better securing and encouraging the trade of his Majesty's sugar colonies
in America," if the Act had been executed with rigour, must have had
the effect of an absolute prohibition.
That the duties
laid on those articles by the present Act still remain so great that,
however otherwise intended, they must undoubtedly have the same effect.
That the importation of foreign molasses into this province in particular
is of the greatest importance, and a prohibition will be prejudicial
to many branches of its trade and will lessen the consumption of the
manufactures of Great Britain. That this importance does not arise merely,
nor principally, from the necessity of foreign molasses in order to
its being consumed or distilled within the province. That if the trade
for many years carried on for foreign molasses can be no longer continued,
a vent cannot be found for more than one half the fish of inferior quality
which are caught and cured by the inhabitants of the province, the French
not per-netting fish to be carried by foreigners to any of their islands,
unless it be bartered or exchanged for molasses.
That if there be
no sale of fish of inferior quality it will be impossible to continue
the fishery, the fish usually sent to Europe will then cost so dear
that the French will be able to undersell the English at all the European
markets; and by this means one of the most valuable returns to Great
Britain will be utterly lost, and that great nursery of seamen destroyed.
That the restraints
laid upon the exportation of timber, boards, staves, and other lumber
from the colonies to Ireland and other parts of Europe, except Great
Britain, must greatly affect the trade of this province and discourage
the clearing and improving of the lands which are yet uncultivated.
That the powers
given by the late Act to the court of vice-admiralty, instituted over
all America, are so expressed as to leave it doubtful, whether goods
seized for illicit importation in any one of the colonies may not be
removed, in order to trial, to any other colony where the judge may
reside, although at many hundred miles distance from the place of seizure.
That if this construction
should be admitted, many persons, however legally they goods may have
been imported, must lose their property, merely from an inability of
following after it, and making that defence which they might do if the
trial had been in the colony where the goods were seized.
That this construction
would be so much the more grievous, seeing that in America the officers
by this Act are indemnified in case of seizure whenever the judge of
admiralty shall certify y that there was probable camise; and the claimant
can neither have costs nor maintain an action against the person seizing,
how much soever he may have expended in defence of his property.
That the extension
of the powers of courts of vice-admiralty has, so far as the jurisdiction
of the said courts hath been extended, deprived the colonies of one
of the' most valuable of English liberties, trials by juries.
That every Act
of Parliament, which in this respect distinguishes his Majesty's subjects
in the colonies from their fellow subjects in Great Britain, must create
a very sensible concern and grief.
That there have
been communicated to your petitioners sundry resolutions of the House
of Commons in their last session for imposing stamp duties or taxes
upon the inhabitants of the colonies, the consideration whereof was
referred to the next session. That your petitioners acknowledge with
all gratitude the tendencies [tenderness of the legislature of Great
Britain of the liberties of the subjects in the colonies, who have always
judged by their representatives both of the way and manner in which
internal taxes should bc raised within their respective governments,
and of the ability of the inhabitants to pay them.
That they humbly
hope the colonies in general have so demeaned themselves, more especially
during the late war, as still to deserve the continuance of all those
liberties which they have hitherto enjoyed.
That although during
the war the taxes upon the colonies were greater than they have been
since the conclusion of it, yet the sources by which the inhabitants
were enabled to pay their taxes having ceased, and their trade being
decayed, they are not so able to pay the taxes they are subjected to
in time of peace as they were the greater taxes in time of war.
That one principal
difficulty which has ever attended the trade of the colonies, proceeds
from the scarcity of money, which scarcity is caused by the balance
of trade with Great Britain, which has been continually against the
colonies. That the drawing sums of money from the colonies from time
to time must distress the trade to that degree that eventually Great
Britain may lose more by the diminution of the consumption of her manufactures
than all the sums which it is possible for the colonies thus to pay
can countervail.
That they humbly
conceive if the taxes which the inhabitants of this province are obliged
annually to pay towards the support of the internal government, the
restraint they are under in their trade for the benefit of Great Britain,
and the consumption thereby occasioned of British manufactures, be all
considered and have their due weight it must appear that the subjects
of this province arc as fully burdened as their fellow subjects in Britain,
and that they are, whilst in America, more beneficial to the nation
than they would be if they should be removed to Britain and there held
to a full proportion of the national taxes and duties of every kind.
Your petitioners,
therefore, most humbly pray that they may be relieved from the burdens
which, they have humbly represented to have been brought upon them by
the late Act of Parliament, as to the wisdom of the honourable House
shall seem meet, that the privileges of the colonies relative to their
internal taxes which they have so
Petition
of the Virginia House of Burgesses to the House of Commons December
18 1764
To the Honourable
the Knights, Citizens, and Burgesses of Great Britain in Parliament
assembled:
The Remonstrance
of the Council and Burgesses of Virginia. It appearing by the printed
votes of the House of Commons of Great Britain in Parliament assembled
that in a committee of the whole House, the 17th day of March last,
it was resolved that towards defending, protecting, and securing the
British colonies and plantations in America, it may be proper to charge
certain stamp duties in the said colonies and plantations; and it being
apprehended that the same subject, which was then declined, may be resumed
and further pursued in a succeeding session, the Council and Burgesses
of Virginia, met in General Assembly, judge it their indispensable duty,
in a respectful manner but with decent firmness, to remonstrate against
such a measure, that at least a cession of those rights, which in their
opinion must be infringed by that procedure, may not be inferred from
their silence, at so important a crisis.
They conceive it
is essential to British liberty that laws imposing taxes on the people
ought not to be made without the consent of representatives chosen by
themselves; who, at the same time that they are acquainted with the
circumstances of their constituents, sustain a proportion of the burden
laid on them. This privilege, inherent in the persons who discovered
and settled these regions, could not be renounced or forfeited by their
removal hither, not as vagabonds or fugitives, but licensed and encouraged
by their prince and animated with a laudable desire of enlarging the
British dominion, and extending its commerce. On the contrary, it was
secured to them and their descendants, with all other rights and immunities
of British subjects, by a royal charter, which hath been invariably
recognized and confirmed by his Majesty and his predecessors in their
commissions to the several governors, granting a power, and prescribing
a forum of legislation; according to which, laws for the administration
of justice, and for the welfare and good government of the colony, have
been hitherto enacted by the Governor, Council, and General Assembly,
and to them requisitions and applications for supplies have been directed
by the Crown. As an instance of the opinion which former sovereigns
entertained of these rights and privileges, we beg leave to refer to
three acts of the General Assembly passed in the 32d year of the reign
of King Charles II (one of which is entitled An Act for raising a Public
Revenue for the better Support of the Government of his Majesty's Colony
of Virginia, imposing several duties for that purpose) which they thought
absolutely necessary, were prepared in England, and sent over by their
then governor, the Lord Culpepper, to be passed by the General Assembly,
with a full power to give the royal assent thereto; and which were accordingly
passed, after several amendments were made to them here. Thus tender
was his Majesty of the rights of his American subjects; and the remonstrants
do not discern by what distinction they can be deprived of that sacred
birthright and most valuable inheritance by their fellow subjects, nor
with what propriety they can be taxed or affected in their estates by
the Parliament, wherein they are not, and indeed cannot, constitutionally
be represented. and if it were proper for the Parliament to impose taxes
on the colonies at all, which the remonstrants take leave to think would
be inconsistent with the fundamental principles of the constitution,
the exercise of that power at this time would be ruinous to Virginia,
who exerted herself in the late war, it is feared, beyond her strength,
insomuch that to redeem the money granted for that exigence her people
are taxed for several years to come; this with the large expenses incurred
for defending the frontiers against the restless Indians, who have infested
her as much since the peace as before, is so grievous that an increase
of the burden will be intolerable; especially as the people are very
greatly distressed already from the scarcity of circulating cash amongst
them, and from the little value of their staple at the British markets.
And it is presumed
that adding to that load which the colony now labours under will not
be more oppressive to her people than destructive of the interests of
Great Britain; for the plantation trade, confined as it is to the mother
country, hath been a principal means of multiplying and enriching her
inhabitants; and if not too much discouraged, may prove an inexhaustible
source of treasure to the nation. For satisfaction in this point, let
the present state of the British fleets and trade be compared with what
they were before the settlement of the colonies; and let it be considered
that whilst property in land may be acquired on very easy terms, in
the vast uncultivated territory of North America, the colonists will
be mostly, if not wholly, employed in agriculture; whereby the exportation
of their commodities of Great Britain, and the consumption of their
manufactures supplied from thence, will be daily increasing. But this
most desirable connection between Great Britain and her colonies, supported
by such a happy intercourse of reciprocal benefits as is continually
advancing the prosperity of both, must be interrupted, if the people
of the latter, reduced to extreme poverty, should be compelled to manufacture
those articles they have been hitherto furnished with from the former.
From these considerations
it is hoped that the honourable House of Commons will not prosecute
a measure which those who may suffer under it cannot but look upon as
fitter for exiles driven from their native country, After ignominiously
forfeiting her favours and protection, than for the prosperity of Britons
who have at all times been forward to demonstrate all due reverence
to the mother kingdom, and are so instrumental in promoting her glory
and felicity; and that British patriots will never consent to the exercise
of anticonstitutional power, which even in this remote corner may be
dangerous in its example to the interior parts of the British Empire,
and will certainly be detrimental to its commerce.
Virginia
Stamp Act Resolutions May 30, 1765
Whereas,
the honourable House of Commons in England, have of late draw[n] into
question how far the General Assembly of this colony hath power to enact
laws for laying of taxes and imposing duties payable by the people of
this, his Majesty's most ancient colony; for settling and ascertaining
the same to all future times, the House of Burgesses of this present
General Assembly have come to the following resolves.
[1] Resolved, that
the first adventurers, settlers of this his Majesty's colony and dominion
of Virginia, brought with them and transmitted to their posterity, and
all other his Majesty's subjects since inhabiting in this his Majesty's
colony, all the privileges and immunities that have at any time been
held, enjoyed, and possessed by the people of Great Britain.
[2] Resolved, that
by two royal charters granted by King James the first, the colonists
aforesaid are declared and entitled to all privileges and immunities
of natural born subject, to all intents and purposes as if they had
been abiding and born within the realm of England.
[3] Resolved, that
the taxation of the people by themselves, or by persons chosen by themselves
to represent them, who can only know what taxes the people are able
to bear, or the easiest method of raising them, and must themselves
be affected by every tax laid on the people, is the only security against
a burdensome taxation, and the distinguishing characteristic of British
freedom, without which the ancient constitution cannot exist.
[4] Resolved, that
his Majesty's liege people of this ancient colony have enjoyed the right
of being thus governed by their own Assembly in the article of taxes
and internal police, and that the same have never been forfeited, or
any other way yielded up, but have been constantly recognized by the
king and people of Great Britain.
[5]* Resolved,
therefore, that the General Assembly of this colony, together with his
Majesty or his substitutes, have in their representatives capacity,
the only exclusive right and power to lay taxes and imposts upon the
inhabitants of this colony; and that every attempt to vest such power
in any other person or persons whatever than the General Assembly aforesaid,
is illegal, unconstitutional, and unjust, and has a manifest tendency
to destroy British as well as American liberty.
[6]* Resolved,
that his Majesty's liege people, the inhabitants of this colony, are
not bound to yield obedience to any law or ordinance whatever, designed
to impose any taxation whatsoever upon them, other than the laws or
ordinances of the General Assembly aforesaid.
[7]* Resolved,
that any person who shall, by speaking or writing, assert or maintain
that any person or persons other than the General Assembly of this colony,
have any right or power to impose or lay any taxation on the people
here, shall be deemed an enemy to his Majesty's colony. _________________
* The last two resolutions
were rejected by the House of Burgesses and the fifth was later rescinded
the following day.
The
Declarations of the Stamp Act Congress October 19, 1765
The members of this
congress, sincerely devoted, with the warmest sentiments of affection
and duty to his Majesty's person and government; inviolably attached
to the present happy establishment of the Protestant succession, and
with minds deeply impressed by a sense of the present and impending
misfortunes of the British colonies on this continent; having considered
as maturely as time would permit, the circumstances of the said colones,
esteem it our indispensable duty to make the following declarations,
of our humble opinion, respecting the most essential rights and liberties
of the colonists, and of the grievances under which they labour, by
reason of several late acts of Parliament.
I. That his Majesty's
subjects in these colonies, owe the same allegiance to the Crown of
Great Britain, that is owing from hs subjects born within the realm,
and all due subordination to that august body, the Parliament of Great
Britain.
II. That his Majesty's
liege subjects in these colonies are entitled to all the inherent rights
and liberties of his natural born subjects within the kingdom of Great
Britain.
III. That it is
inseparably essential to the freedom of a people, and the undoubted
right of Englishmen, that no taxes should be imposed on them, but with
their own consent, given personally, or by their representatives.
IV. That the people
of these colonies are not, and from their local circumstances,
cannot be represented
in the House of Commons in Great Britain.
V. That the only
representatives of the people of these colonies, are persons chosen
therein by themselves; and that no taxes ever have been, or can be constitutionally
imposed on them, but by their respective legislature.
VI. That all supplies
to the Crown, being free gifts of the people, it is unreasonable and
inconsistent with the principles and spirit of the British constitution,
for the people of Great Britain to grant to his majesty the property
of the colonists
VII. That trial
by jury is the inherent an invaluable right of every British subject
in these colonies.
VIII. That the
late Act of Parliament, entitled, An Act for granting and applying certain
Stamp Duties, and other Duties in the British Colonies and Plantations
in America, etc., by imposing taxes on the inhabitants of these colonies,
and the said Act, and several other Acts, by extending the jurisdiction
of the courts of admiralty beyond its ancient limits, have a manifest
tendency to subvert the rights and liberties of the colonists.
IX. That the duties
imposed by several late Acts of Parliament, from the peculiar circumstances
of these colonies, will be extremely burdensome and grievous, and from
the scarcity of specie, the payment of them absolutely impracticable.
X. That as the
profits of the trade of these colonies ultimately centre in Great Britain,
to pay for the manufactures which they are obliged to take from thence,
they eventually contribute very largely to all supplies granted there
to the Crown.
XI. That the restrictions
imposed by several late Acts of Parliament, on the trade of these
colonies, will render
them unable to purchase the manufactures of Great Britain.
XII. That the increase,
prosperity and happiness of these colonies, depend on the full and free
enjoyment of their rights and liberties, and an intercourse with Great
Britain, mutually affectionate and advantageous.
XIII. That it is
the right of the British subjects in these colonies, to petition the
king or either house of Parliament.
Lastly, that it
is the indispensable duty of these colonies to the best of sovereigns,
to the mother country, and to themselves, to endeavour by a loyal and
dutiful address to his Majesty, and humble applications to both houses
of Parliament, to procure the repeal of the Act for granting and applying
certain stamp duties, of all clauses of any other Acts of Parliament,
whereby the jurisdiction of the admiralty is extended as aforesaid,
and of the other late Acts for the restriction of American commerce.
Non-importation
Agreement of New York Merchants October 31, 1765
[New York Mercury,
7 November 1765]
At a general meeting
of the merchants of the city of New York, trading to GreatBritain, at
the house of Mr. George Burns, of the said city, innholder, to consider
what was necessary to be done in the present situation of affairs with
respect to the Stamp Act, and the melancholy state of the North American
commerce, so greatly restricted by the impositions and duties established
by the late acts of trade, they came to the following resolutions, viz.
First. That in
all orders they send out to Great Britain for goods or merchandise of
any nature, kind, or quality whatsoever, usually imported from Great
Britain, they will direct their correspondents not to ship them unless
the Stamp Act be repealed. It is nevertheless agreed that all such merchants
as are owners of and have vessels already gone, and now cleared out
for Great Britain, shall be at liberty to bring back in them, on their
own accounts, crates and casks of earthen ware, grindstones, pipes,
and such other bulky articles as owners usually fill up their vessels
with.
Secondly. It is
further unanimously agreed that all orders already sent home, shall
be countermanded by the very first conveyance; and the goods and merchandise
thereby ordered, not to be sent unless upon the condition mentioned
in the foregoing resolution.
Thirdly. It is
further unanimously agreed that no merchant will vend any goods or merchandise
sent upon commission from Great Britain that shall be shipped from thence
after the first day of January next unless upon the condition mentioned
in the first resolution.
Fourthly. It is
further unanimously agreed that the foregoing resolutions shall be binding
until the same are abrogated at a general meeting hereafter to be held
for that purpose. In witness whereof we have hereunto respectively subscribed
our names.
[This was subscribed
by upwards of two hundred principal merchants.]
In consequence
of the foregoing resolutions the retailers of goods of the city of New
York subscribed a paper in the words following, viz.
We, the underwritten,
retailers of goods, do hereby promise and oblige ourselves not to buy
any goods, wares, or merchandises of any person or persons whatsoever
that shall he shipped from Great Britain after the first day of January
next unless the Stamp Act shall be repealed-as witness our hands.
Connecticut
Resolutions on the Stamp Act December 10, 1765
[Printed in
The Massachusetts Gazette 19 December 1765.]
At a meeting of
a large assembly of the respectable populace in New London the 10th
of December 1765, the following resolves were unanimously come into.
Resolved, 1st. That
every form of government rightfully founded, originates from the consent
of the people.
2d. That the boundaries
set by the people in all constitutions are the only limits within which
any officer can lawfully exercise authority.
3d. That whenever
those bounds are exceeded, the people have a right to reassume the exercise
of that authority which by nature they had before they delegated it
to individuals.
4th. That every
tax imposed upon English subjects without consent is against the natural
rights and the bounds prescribed by the English constitution.
5th. That the Stamp
Act in special, is a tax imposed on the colonies without their consent.
6th. That it is
the duty of every person in the colonies to oppose by every lawful means
the execution of those acts imposed on them, and if they can in no other
way be relieved, to reassume their natural rights and the authority
the laws of nature and of God have vested them with.
And in order effectually
to prevent the execution thereof, it is recommended:
1st. That every
officer in this colony duly execute the trust reposed in him, agreeable
to the true spirit of the English constitution and the laws of this
colony.
2d. That every
officer neglecting the exercise of his office may justly expect the
resentment of the people, and those who proceed may depend on their
protection.
3d. It is presumed
no person will publicly, in the pulpit or otherwise, inculcate the doctrine
of passive obedience, or any other doctrine tending to quiet the minds
of the people, in a tame submission to any unjust impositions.
4th. We fully concur
with the respectable body of the populace in all their Resolves made
at Windham the 26th November 1765 and published in the New-London
Gazette.
Lt.-Gov.
William Bull to the Board of Trade November 3, 1765
I think it my duty
to acquaint your lordships with some very extraordinary and universal
commotions which have happened in this town upon the arrival of the
stamp papers.
Accounts had been
received from Boston of the outrages committed there on the 14h and
26th of August last, and also of those at Rhode Island, to show their
determined resolutions to prevent or elude the execution of the Stamp
Act in those provinces, and also of the intentions which other provinces
at the northward had expressed to the like purpose, though not with
so much violence, all which have undoubtedly been transmitted to your
lordships and I now presume to mention them only, as the unhappy cause
of what has happened here.
New England vaunts
its numbers and arrogates glory to itself in taking the lead of North
America. For before those accounts came, the people of this province
though they conceived it too great a burden, seemed generally disposed
to pay a due obedience to the Act, and at the same time in a dutiful
and respectful manner to represent to his Majesty the hardships which
it would lay them under, and to pray relief therein. I must do them
the justice to add that in all other respects the king has no subjects
that express and show more loyalty to his majesty than the people of
this province.
But by the artifices
of some busy spirits the minds of men here were so universally poisoned
with the principles which were imbibed and propagated from Boston and
Rhode Island (from which towns, at this time of the year vessels very
frequently arrive) that after their example, the people of this town
resolved to seize and destroy the stamp papers, and to take every means
of deterring the stamp officers from executing their duty.
Upon the arrival
of the stamp papers on the 20th ultimo a great concourse of men assembled.
Application was thereupon made to me for protection of the papers. As
the intention of the populace were too well known to be doubted, I thought
it my duty to secure them from destruction or even insult and therefore
requested Capt. Fanshawe of his Majesty's sloop Speedwell to receive
them on board until it should be necessary to remove them on shore for
the execution of the Act. His ship was then heaving down at Hobcaw to
careen and he thought it not safe to have them on board as he lay at
a wharf; I then desired he would send his boats armed to take the packages
of stamp papers out of the ship which brought them before night, at
which time the populace vowed to execute their design. This he readily
complied with, and I sent the papers down to Fort Johnson, and lest
their madness should attempt to carry their scheme into execution, I
reinforced the garrison with a detachment of a sergeant aud 12 Royal
Americans who happened to be in town, that the appearance of military
troops joining the few provincials there might deter them from the rash
undertaking; and I gave directions to Col. Howorth, who commands in
that fort, to take every precaution against a surprise, and put it in
the best posture of defence against an escalade. These measures happily
prevented their making any attempt on the papers. Their fury was then
directed towards striking a terror into the stamp officers if they persisted
to perform their duty; which was done by night in great numbers, battering
the house of Mr. Saxby, who was suspected to be arrived, though he then
was not, and hunting after Mr. Caleb Lloyd, searching his lodgings,
who prudently had withdrawn himself.
On the same day
the information was given to me that the stamp papers were arrived,
I summoned the Council, acquainting them therewith and what I had done
thereon, and took my oath to use my utmost endeavours to carry the Act
into execution, and as this commotion began on Saturday while the Court
of General Sessions for the whole province was sitting in town, I thought
proper to recommend to the chief justice to require all peace officers
to exert themselves in suppressing such unlawful assemblies. But the
infection was too generally spread to receive any check from his authority.
On the Monday, being informed what had happened on Saturday and Sunday
nights, I published a proclamation offering a reward from my own pocket
of £50 sterling to any person who would discover the author of
the outrage, and a pardon to any informer who was an accomplice, aud
commanded all judges, etc., to do their duty in preserving the public
peace, but all this produced not the desired effect. And some insults
having been committed on several persons' houses under pretext of searching
for stamp papers, I ordered an advertisement to be published that they
were by my order lodged in Fort Johnson. The commotions upon this in
some measure subsided till the arrival of Mr. Saxby from London on the
27th when everything was again set in motion by a very great concourse
of people threaten in everything against the persons and effects of
Mr. Saxby and Mr. Lloyd to deter them or any other person from doing
their duty under that Act. Mr. Saxby having been apprised of these dispositions
by his friends on the first arrival of the ship, prudently declined
coming up to town but went on shore at Fort Johnson, whither Mr. Lloyd
had also retired for his safety, which was all the protection my power
could afford them. The commotions still continued and all this during
the sitting of the Court of Sessions which by law is vested with the
powers of the King's Bench in criminal matters, till on Monday these
two officers, prevailed upon by the importunate request of their friends,
consented to decline acting until the sense of the Parliament of Great
Britain should be known upon the joint petition of the colonies which
is now on the anvil at New York. These two gentlemen wrote me a letter
on the occasion of their declining to act, a copy whereof I have the
honour to transmit to your lordships.
Although these
very numerous assemblies of the people bore the appearance of common
populace, yet there is great reason to apprehend they were animated
and encouraged by some considerable men who stood behind the curtain.
This contagion has spread through this whole country and many are alarmed
by various false representations, not only of what this act enjoins,
but with fears of what is to follow from future laws of the like nature.
As there are no
stamp papers can be issued during this situation, a stop is now put
to all business in every office where they are required, and notwithstanding
the great inconveniences and detriments which it will occasion, the
people at present seem determined to submit to them patiently all they
see the fate of New England, which I presume they will follow, in returning
to their duty in this matter, as soon as they know that province is
brought to theirs.
I have thus endeavoured,
my lords, to represent to your lordships a faithful and circumstantial
account of the unhappy situation of this province on account of this
spirit of opposition to the Stamp Act, in which relation I thought it
my duty to be very particular that your lordships might be the better
enabled to judge what was necessary to be done for his Majesty's service
thereupon, and at the same time, my lords, may I humbly hope to appear
to your lordships to have performed everything in my power for the service
of his Majesty and the preserving the public peace of the province;
and I flatter myself I shall, when your lordships will please to consider
that I had none but the civil magistracy to enforce my orders, and that
they are to be supported by the posse comitatus, of which these concourses
of people were composed; and I am morally certain, my lords, any attempt
to quell them by force would have occasioned the shedding of blood without
effecting the end proposed thereby.
The new elected
General Assembly met on the 29th ultimo and in their answer to my recommending
to them to form their deliberations upon the principle of duty to his
Majesty and the considering the service of the king and their country
as in-separable and as the surest foundation whereon to establish the
tranquillity, prosperity, and happiness of their country, they declared
heir resolution to proceed upon those dutiful and loyal principles,
which they trusted would produce freedom and happiness to their constituents.
Being too early to enter upon the ordinary business of the year, they
had my leave to adjourn to the 25th instant. Whether a little longer
time and the examples of the assemblies of several other provinces in
coming to bold resolutions which assert the independency of America
in taxing themselves, exclusive of any other power, will contaminate
our Assembly and lead them to come to such resolutions also, is what
I do not think impossible, though it may be at present some-what doubtful,
wherefore I will not flatter your lordships or myself with too sanguine
expectations therein.
I humbly beg your
lordships to be assured that I shall do everything in my power to prevent
the prerogative of the Crown from receiving any indignity, though as
I had the honour to observe before to your lordships, my power can extend
its influence but a little way under the present almost universal disposition
of the people against the admitting the execution of the Stamp Act.
As the Grenville
packet is daily expected here, I may probably receive the Stamp Act
by that opportunity; in the meantime I shall continue to acquaint your
lordships with the proceedings in this province on this subject and
with great punctuality perform any commands with which his Majesty or
your lordships shall be pleased to honour me.
Letter
of Henry Cruger, Jr. to Henry Cruger, Sr. February 14, 1766
The debates in
Parliament lasting so long on the Stamp Act determined me to return
to my business ere it was terminated. I was three weeks in London, and
every day with some one member of Parliament, talking as it were for
my own life. It is surprising how ignorant some of them are of trade
and America. The House at last came to a resolution to examine only
one person from each place that brought petitions. Mr. William Reeve,
being the senior of us who went from Bristol, was put in the votes.
Upon hearing of this resolve, I set out and arrived here late last night;
it is now afternoon, and not until this moment would Mr. Penington let
me know his vessel was bound to New York. He assures me no man in Bristol
knows it but Mr. Hayes and myself. I will employ what little time I
have in scribbling as much news to you as I can, supposing everybody
on your side are impatient for the Stamp Act. Tuesday the 11th instant
Mr. Trecothick was ordered to the bar of the House of Commons, where
he was examined, and X examined 3½ hours; the last question Lord
Strange (your enemy) asked was this: if he did not think the Americans
would rather submit to the S[tamp] Act than remain in the confusion
they are in? It was not a proper question. Mr. Trecothick was ordered
to withdraw; some debates ensued; he was recalled to the bar and told
the House had altered the question to this: if it was not his opinion
the Americans would acquiesce with the Stamp Act provided it was mitigated:
Mr. Trecothick answered it was his opinion that no modification of the
Act would reconcile it and that the Americans would be contented with
nothing less than a Total Repeal.
This inflamed Grenville's
party. They called you insolent rebels. I dread his party coming into
power before the Act is repealed. If they do, they'll certainly scourge
you although some English merchants are ruined by it.
We have proved
the debt from the continent of America to England is five millions sterling.
This Grenville attempted to disprove, and is what makes the examinations
at the bar so tedious.
All the principal
manufacturing towns have sent petitions for a repeal of the Stamp Act.
A manufacturer from Leeds was ordered to the bar, who said since the
stagnation of the American trade he has been constrained to turn off
300 families out of 600 he constantly employed. This fact will have
great weight when added to many more evidences of the like kind. The
country members are somewhat alarmed at so many people losing employ;
if anything repeals the Act, it must be this. The present ministry see
and have declared the expediency of repealing on this ground. If the
late ministers come in again and enforce the Act, they will have 20,000
unemployed poor in a suppliant manner petitioning a repeal of the S[tamp]
Act; otherwise they must starve, or so I think. There is no doubt but
it must be repealed on some grounds, or some cause or other, especially
if you stick to your engagements of having no English goods until it
is effectuated. This resolution I hope you'll abide by. Nay! it is my
opinion this tiresome procrastination would never have happened if you
had sent no ships away till it was decided, for Mr. Grenville has declared
he will try to keep it off this 6 weeks in hopes you will at last submit,
saying it is a proof you .are tired by venturing to send your ships
away, and that he has no doubt you will also soon bc tired of the lawless
state you are in. retrospect to the question Lord Strange put to Mr.
Trecothick, I attended the House of Commons all day Tuesday the 11th
instant In the evening a member (who is in the administration) told
me things were doubtful and went vastly hard with them; that the k[ing]
was not staunch to his ministers; that although he assured them he would
support them, yet he had deceived them; that they daily and hourly experience
Lord Bute's dreadful influence, that the k[ing] had empowered Lord Bute
and Lord Strange to say his private wish was not tor a repeal of the
Stamp Act as it would be derogatory to the honour of his Crown and dignity
of his Parliament to be compelled to repeal an Act that had been so
disrespectfully treated without first exercising their authority by
enforcing it. He further told me that the k[inq] acted with great duplicity-it
is amazing what power Lord Bute continues to have over him! My friend
further said he thought notwithstanding all this they would yet have
a repeal of the Stamp Act. At one time the present ministry were bent
upon resigning, on finding the duke of York and duke of Gloucester were
against them, also all the k[ing]'s immediate servants such as the lords
of the bed chamber and nine bishops; they were for carrying fire and
sword to America with this argument: that since you snarl and begin
to show your teeth, they ought to be knocked out before you are able
to bite.
Endorsed is a minute
or two I made the days they happened. By them you'll see the sentiments
of the great.
You also have an
exact copy of Mr. Grenville's motion in the House which I had address
enough to get, he little thinking what use was to be made of it, though
if he knew I don't suppose it would give him any concern. he was backed
upon a division (after debating till 11 o'clock at night) by 134 though
lost it by a majority of 140. I saw the list of the minority. In it
were Sir Charles Hardy and General Abercrombie. These are the thanks
for the old Madeira you have given them. 0! Curse them! About 10 o'clock
when the House were almost wearied out, old General Howard stood up.
At his martial appearance a profound silence ensued. he spoke (I don't
pretend to give you his words, only the substance) to this effect: that
he shuddered at the unnatural motion; he hoped in God it would not succeed,
for in all likelihood he might be ordered to execute it, and before
he would imbrue his hands in the blood of his countrymen who were contending
for English liberty he would, if ordered, draw his sword, but would
soon after sheath it in his own body. secretary Conway said (though
not at the same time) that he would sooner cut off his right arm than
sign an order for soldiers to enforce the Act. The majority against
it in the House of Commons were 274; yet, when you reflect that 134
were for it, it is enough to make you tremble. When I left London the
12th instant it was about three to one the Act would be repealed, but
for three weeks past there has been no dependence on anything we hear-neither
king nor Parliament knew. Today the ministry would have the best of
it, and things would look well; tomorrow Grenville and his party would
gain the power, and then of course no repeal. The vox populi now begins
to gain ground, and I think since the legality of taxation is allowed,
the Act will be repealed upon the ground of expediency.
These particulars,
few and inconclusive as they are, I thought would still be agreeable,
for the authenticity of them I will answer.
As so much politics
may confound business, I will do myself the honour to write you a few
lines on the latter subject in another epistle. I remain with all due
respect in haste my Dear Sir Your Most Dutiful Son etc.
H. C. Jr.
P.S.-The Parliament
have not yet done anything about the Sugar Act and other destructive
restraint on your trade. It will come a soon as ever the Stamp Act is
settled. I imagine they will rescind all the restrictive clauses, and
grant you everything you ask. Their eyes are at last opened and they
seem convinced what vast benefit will accrue to this kingdom by giving
you almost an unlimited trade, so far as doth not interfere with British
manufactures. The West Indians are collecting all their force to oppose
us; I have reason to say they will at length be defeated.
'Tis said French
sugars, coffee, cotton, etc., the produce of foreign islands, will have
the indulgence of being imported in our colonies duty free, but must
be put in kings warehouses, and the proprietors constrained to ship
them off again (to any part of the world they please) in a stipulated
time.
The duty on molasses
will be reduced to 1d per gallon.
[To Aaron
Lopez, Bristol, 1 March 1766]
The confusion of
American affairs hath affected us equally. I have been very deeply involved
in them, and think myself amply rewarded with the bare aspect which
now abounds with looks and promises success to America. The Stamp Act
is not yet repealed, but it is as good as done. A motion was made in
the House of Commons for a bill to be brought in for a repeal and was
carried by 275 against 167: the latter were only for a modification
of the Act. The debates pro and con have been very warm and serious.
As I have not time now to be particular, will trouble you with a copy
of my last letter to my father just for your amusement. There is little
doubt but the affairs will be finished in a few days and the Act repealed.
You'll be informed that the Parliament have settled their right of taxing
you. When that was done they proceeded to the expediency of repealing
the Act, which never would have come to pass had it not been for the
merchants and manufacturers of England. Trade here was totally stagnated;
not one American merchant gave out a single order for goods on purpose
to compel all manufacturers to engage with us in petitioning Parliament
for a repeal of the Stamp Act, by which thousands were out of employ
and in a starving condition. You, dear sir, shared in the common calamity.
I hope and persuade myself you will not murmur at this momentary disappointment
when so much good will come out of it. I hug myself the Parliament will
never trouble America again. I could not think of giving out any of
your orders until I saw which way this momentous affair would turn and
terminate. I congratulate you on our success and with redoubled joy-as
the contrary was at one time much dreaded. The letter I shall enclose
you will give you a great insight into the actions and sentiments of
our British senators.
Immediately upon
hearing by express that a bill was to be brought in the House of Commons
for a total repeal, I set about providing your orders, all which I hope
to have shipped on board the Charlotte, Captain Brown, by the latter
end of this month. No doubt you'll wonder at not hearing from me oftener
of late. I have the best excuse that ever I had for not writing, even
a serving my country, which I have been doing day and night. I am no
politician, but in this matter of America and its trade I embarked body
and soul. I have been in London with all the great men in the kingdom.
The Stamp and Sugar Acts were my two objects. I think you American gentlemen
will have all your wishes gratified, but more of this in my next. I
only claim a share of the merit if all comes to pass that I expect.
See the P.S. of the letter to my father. I will be very punctual in
future to make amends for my past silence; have patience and you'll
reap the advantages.
|